In LO and in Holship, the EFTA Court dealt with the relationship between collective bargaining and industrial action on the one hand and competition law on the other. In LO we went against the Commission which wanted us to acknowledge the general immunity of collective agreements from the European competition rules.

2017-10-26

The EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) monitors compliance with the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway; the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) States which are a part of the EEA Agreement, allowing them to participate in the Internal Market of the European Union. EFTA Court - EU Courts EFTA Court often has to deal with questions unresolved by the ECJ What happens in the event of a divergence? E-9/07 L‘Oréal: [neither] explicitly addresses the situation where the EFTA Court has ruled on an issue first and the ECJ has subsequently come to a different conclusion. However, the consequences for EFTA-domstolen har definitivt ikke gjort det. EFTAs uttalelse om blokaden av Holship | FriFagbevegelse JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript.

Holship efta court

05/06/2015 EFTA Court. 1 rue du Fort Thüngen. L-1499 Luxembourg (+352) 42 10 81 (+352) 43 43 89. www.eftacourt.int 18 Holship is a Norwegian forwarding agent wholly owned by a Danish company. Its main activity in Norway is cleaning fruit crates but it is not involved in the transport of the crates. In addition, Holship handles certain goods transported by ships.

The opinion of the EFTA Court in Cases E-11/07 and E-1/08 . 10779, see for a recent example Case E-14/15 Holship. 322 Different opinions exist regarding

EN. Case. E-4/15.

2017-10-26

HSG EFTA court in case E-14/15 - Holship Norge AS v Norsk. Transportarbeidsforbund. Ronny Gjendemsjø, Assoc. Professor, University of Bergen & BECCLE:. 30 Sep 2013 and most recently, Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund (E-14/15 ), EFTA Court, 19 April 2016, followed by the decision of the 19 янв 2018 Former President of the EFTA Court, Full Professor em. University of St. 104Case E-14/15 Holship, cited above, paragraph 127. 105Case The EFTA Court (E-14/15.

Introduction .
Uppsala university library

It is not clear which of the two European courts in question, the Strasbourg Court or the ECJ, will be the first to decide.

That provision corresponds in substance to Article 260(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“TFEU Holship would also be required to pay for the unloading and loading assignments at the applicable rates set by the AO. The EFTA Court held that a collective bargaining agreement imposing the use of pool dockers goes beyond the core objects and elements of collective bargaining. EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Principality of Liechtenstein. Book 1.
The travel book a journey through every country in the world

32 Holship, ESA and the Commission, mainly relying on the conditions set out in the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“ECJ”) in Albany (C-67/96, EU:C:1999:430) and the Court’s judgment in LO (Case E-8/00 Landsorganisasjonen i Norge [2002] EFTA Ct. Rep. 114) (“LO”), claim that the priority clause goes beyond the

However, the consequences for EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY DECISION . of 17 September 2020 . Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice. 2 (the “SCA”) in particular its Article 25a and Protocol 8 thereof, Having regard to the Act referred to at point 31i of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement, 2017-10-26 Noruega - The Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions takes Holship conflict to the European Court of Human Rights The conflict between trade unions and freight entreprises in Drammen port has been ongoing since 2013 and in recent years, has become a legal dispute. EFTA-domstolen har definitivt ikke gjort det. EFTAs uttalelse om blokaden av Holship | FriFagbevegelse JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript.

The EFTA Court has long held that the EEA Agreement must be ‘interpreted in the light of fundamental rights’Footnote 5and that the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘the Convention’) and the case law of the Strasbourg Court are to be considered, as reiterated in several judgments, ‘important sources’ for the determination of the content of rights under EEA law.

Summary Page 917 of the Judgment. 1 EFTA States must take the measures necessary to comply with a judgment of the Court under Article 33 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (“SCA”). That provision corresponds in substance to Article 260(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“TFEU Holship would also be required to pay for the unloading and loading assignments at the applicable rates set by the AO. The EFTA Court held that a collective bargaining agreement imposing the use of pool dockers goes beyond the core objects and elements of collective bargaining.

2. Advertise for FREE. Free e-news.